Extended Mammogram Classification From Textural Features

  • A Bajcsi Department of Computer Science, Babes-Bolyai University, 1, M. Kogalniceanu Street, 400084, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
  • C. Chira Department of Computer Science, Babes-Bolyai University, 1, M. Kogalniceanu Street, 400084, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
  • A Andreica Department of Computer Science, Babes-Bolyai University, 1, M. Kogalniceanu Street, 400084, Cluj-Napoca, Romania

Abstract

The efficient analysis of digital mammograms has an important role in the early detection of breast cancer and can lead to a higher percentage of recovery. This paper presents an extended computer-aided diagnosis system for the classification of mammograms into three classes (normal, benign and malignant). The performance of the system is evaluated for two different mammogram databases (MIAS and DDSM) in order to assess its robustness. We discuss the changes required in the system, particularly at the level of the image preprocessing and feature extraction. Computational experiments are performed based on different methods for feature extraction, selection and classification. The results indicate an accuracy of 66.95% for the MIAS dataset and 54.1% for DDSM obtained using genetic algorithm based feature selection and Random Forest classification.

References

[1] Arora, R., Rai, P. K., and Raman, B. Deep feature–based automatic classification of mammograms. Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing 58, 6 (June 2020), 1199–1211.
[2] Bajcsi, A., Andreica, A., and Chira, C. Towards feature selection for digital mammogram classification. Procedia Computer Science 192 (2021), 632–641.
[3] Bektas, B., Emre, I. E., Kartal, E., and Gulsecen, S. Classification of mammography images by machine learning techniques. In 2018 3rd International Conference on Computer Science and Engineering (UBMK) (2018), pp. 580–585.
[4] Boudraa, S., Melouah, A., and Merouani, H. F. Improving mass discrimination in mammogram-cad system using texture information and super-resolution reconstruction. Evolving Systems 11, 4 (Dec 2020), 697–706.
[5] Candra, D., Novitasari, R., Lubab, A., Sawiji, A., and Asyhar, A. H. Application of feature extraction for breast cancer using one order statistic, GLCM, GLRLM, and GLDM. Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal 4, 4 (2019), 115–120.
[6] Chaieb, R., and Kalti, K. Feature subset selection for classification of malignant and benign breast masses in digital mammography. Pattern Analysis and Applications 22, 3 (Aug. 2019), 803–829.
[7] Heath, M., Bowyer, K., Kopans, D., Moore, R., and Kegelmeyer, W. P. The digital database for screening mammography. In Proceedings of the 5th International Workshop on Digital Mammography (2001), M. Yaffe, Ed., Medical Physics, pp. 212-218.
[8] Li, F., Shang, C., Li, Y., and Shen, Q. Interpretable mammographic mass classification with fuzzy interpolative reasoning. Knowledge-Based Systems 191 (2020), 105279.
[9] Maitra, I. K., Nag, S., and Bandyopadhyay, S. K. Technique for preprocessing of digital mammogram. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine 107, 2 (2012), 175–188.
[10] Malebary, S. J., and Hashmi, A. Automated breast mass classification system using deep learning and ensemble learning in digital mammogram. IEEE Access 9 (2021), 55312–55328.
[11] Mathapati, M., Chidambaranathan, S., Nasir, A. W., Vimalarani, G., Rani, S. S., and Gopalakrishnan, T. An intelligent internet of medical things with deep learning based automated breast cancer detection and classification model. In Cognitive Internet of Medical Things for Smart Healthcare. Springer International Publishing, Oct. 2020, pp. 181–193.
[12] Mohanty, F., Rup, S., Dash, B., Majhi, B., and Swamy, M. N. S. Digital mammogram classification using 2D-BDWT and GLCM features with FOA-based feature selection approach. Neural Computing and Applications 32, 11 (June 2020), 7029–7043.
[13] Pedro, R. W. D., Machado-Lima, A., and Nunes, F. L. Is mass classification in mammograms a solved problem? - a critical review over the last 20 years. Expert Systems with Applications 119 (2019), 90–103.
[14] Santos, G. PHOC descriptor applied for mammography classification. Revista de Informatica Teorica e Aplicada 27, 1 (2020), 26–35.
[15] Suckling, J., Parker, J., and Dance, D. The mammographic image analysis society digital mammogram database. In International Congress Series (01 1994), vol. 1069, pp. 375–378.
[16] Xie, L., Zhang, L., Hu, T., Huang, H., and Yi, Z. Neural networks model based on an automated multi-scale method for mammogram classification. Knowledge-Based Systems 208 (2020), 106465
Published
2023-02-06
How to Cite
BAJCSI, A; CHIRA, C.; ANDREICA, A. Extended Mammogram Classification From Textural Features. Studia Universitatis Babeș-Bolyai Informatica, [S.l.], v. 67, n. 2, p. 5-20, feb. 2023. ISSN 2065-9601. Available at: <https://www.cs.ubbcluj.ro/~studia-i/journal/journal/article/view/80>. Date accessed: 25 apr. 2024. doi: https://doi.org/10.24193/subbi.2022.2.01.
Section
Articles